Edmonds School Board considering teacher layoffs to address $17.7 million shortfall

Edmonds School Board Vice-President Deborah Kilgore and Board President Diana White listen as Superintendent Kris McDuffy explains the efforts of district staff to balance the budget for the 2019-20 school year.

The Edmonds School District Board of Directors held a special meeting early Wednesday morning to discuss ways to address a projected $17.7 million shortfall in the upcoming 2019-20 school year, including teacher and staff layoffs.

As of the Wednesday, May 8 meeting, 43 full-time employees (FTEs) of the district labeled as certificated or classified potentially face being laid off, district staff said. Affected positions include teachers, paraeducators and assistant principals. More than half the employees facing layoffs are provisional status — meaning they are in their first three years of working for the district.

Since January, the school board has worked to find solutions for the expected budget shortfall. Unlike the neighboring Everett, Snohomish, Mukilteo, Lake Stevens, Marysville and Arlington school districts, the Edmonds School District is the only district facing layoffs. Superintendent Kris McDuffy said the prospect of layoffs is tough, but because 88 percent of the district’s budget is employee salaries and benefits, there are few other options.

“It’s been excruciating for everybody,” she said. “We’ve been looking under every rock and examining every line item.”

Because the Washington State Legislature last year reduced the amount of money school districts could collect from voter-approved property tax levies, the Edmonds School District suffered a near $20 million loss, said Executive Director of Business and Finance Lydia Sellie. In 2018, the district collected more than $67 million, but in 2019 only $47 million was levied, she said.

School Board President Diana White noted that some people have suggested that the pay raises received by Edmonds School District teachers in 2018 contributed to the current budget issue.

“I hear that a lot — that the reason we’re in this (shortfall) is because of the raises we gave,” she said. “But that’s not really true.”

In addition to staff reductions to address the deficit, the board of directors will avoid filling multiple vacant positions, including three custodians, one groundskeeper, a special education data-processing specialist and a technology support specialist. The budget would also cut $2.5 million in expenses for materials, supplies and operations budget and slash more than 300 daily hours for paraeducators.

However, much is still to be determined before the new school year, Superintendent McDuffy said. No final decision will be made on the plan until the board of directors votes at the May 14 school board meeting. Should the layoffs become a reality, affected faculty will know the following day.

“This is evolving by the hour, literally,” she said.

Before casting their votes at the May 14 meeting, the school board directors have several variables to consider — including employees who are resigning or retiring, future student enrollment, the number of students per classroom and the number of teachers required to teach those students. According to data collected by district staff, enrollment for the coming school year is not projected to increase, Sellie said.

“The state funds employees based on the number of students the district has,” she said.

Should more students enroll in the district than schools can accommodate with projected staffing needs, Sellie said, the school board could tap additional funding to bring in more teachers. Board Vice-President Deborah Kilgore said she was not sure the board should project a decline in student enrollment, which would result in more cuts due to the need for fewer teachers.

“We’re turning people’s lives upside down,” she said.

Board Director Anne McMurray said she would like more community feedback before voting on the proposed plan at the school board’s next meeting.

“As we’re thinking about this, we need to remember how the community as a whole views their investment,” she said. “

The next Edmonds School Board meeting will take place on Tuesday, May 14 at 6:30 p.m. at the district’s Educational Services Center, located at 20420 68th Ave. W., Lynnwood.

—Story and photo by Cody Sexton

  1. I’m curious about the statement: “I hear that a lot — that the reason we’re in this (shortfall) is because of the raises we gave,” she said. “But that’s not really true.” I would like to know some information backing up why Ms. White thinks that the raises do not contribute to the shortfall.

  2. Should be simple to figure…how much was the total amount of the raises? Maybe more fair to ask how much were the raises above the CPI increases that apparently every governmental body agrees to pay?

    1. It is part of the “speparate budgets” argument that has been going on since well before I stopped using public schools back in the 80’s. Back then they would rob from Books and the Maintenance budgets to spend on Bussing because those two were easier to pass a suplimental levy.

      There is not a single budget with subsets, they break into frankly as many as the director wants. So when they can build a brand new elementary for $50 million but also want to pass a levy because of shortfall of books it makes sense in their corporate speak.

      The raise was $10,000 across the board, this means a 1st year walking in the door is now making $66,000 a year and extremely few 14 years make less than 6 figures.

      1. Double checking my number was slightly off, instead of starting at 56k and going to 66k they start at 52,688 bump to $62,688.


        The 14 year part is accurate, in fact it is even more generous to the teachers as they changed the top structure. Where it took 28 years to hit top pay $101,022 now it only takes 14 to get $114,272. This means if you were a 14-27 year you got the $10,000 raise and the bump to top level at the same time. And of course that means 14 additional years of being at that pay level compared to before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *